Wells & Mendip Astronomers
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Coming up...
  • The Gallery
    • Aurora 2024 May 10
    • Messier Objects
    • Nebulae
    • Star Clusters
    • Galaxies
    • Solar system
  • ONLINE ASTRO
  • Blog
  • ARCHIVE
  • Shop
  • Committee
  • Contact Us
  • Links





M81 by Ian Humphreys, WMA member

Dark Matter                                                              by Gordon Dennis

5/4/2020

2 Comments

 
A question often asked is “what is dark matter?”  The answer touches all our understanding of physics - from the very large, at the scale of galaxy clusters; down to the very small, at the level of fundamental particles.  Our best answer:  we do not know.  We know something of what dark matter does.  But we don’t know what dark matter is.
To be concise, I’ll call dark matter ‘DM’ from now on.  “Normal matter” interacts with gravity, and particularly with electromagnetic radiation.  In everyday terms, if we heat up normal matter, it will emit electromagnetic radiation.  If it shines in the visible region, we can see it with our own eyes.  This is exactly what we see when looking at the night sky.  In complete contrast, DM does not appear to interact with electromagnetic radiation at all.  We see only its gravitational effects. So, what kind of evidence do we have pointing to the existence of DM?
Let’s look at just three of the many pieces of evidence for the existence of DM.

Clue 1: Motion of galaxies in galaxy clusters
The first person to postulate the existence of DM was Swiss astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky, in 1933.  Zwicky spent most of his life at Princeton and his observations showed that the gravitational attraction between all the visible matter in the Coma galaxy cluster could not account for the observed velocities of the individual galaxies. 

Picture
The galaxies are moving so fast that they would exceed the escape velocity of the system (as shown in the inset equation) and would therefore fly apart.  The cluster of galaxies would not exist, whereas we can see it plainly using telescopes.  Zwicky concluded that there must be much more mass than could be seen visually.
Since this missing mass is invisible, Zwicky called it “dunkle materie”-  DM.  And it was not just a little missing mass – it was a massive amount, many times the mass of the visible matter.   At the time, many scientists were openly sceptical of this idea.

Clue 2: Rotation Curves of spiral galaxies
In the solar system with its eight planets orbiting the Sun, the innermost planet Mercury orbits faster than the second planet, Venus.  In turn, Earth orbits slower, Mars slower still and so on.  This is called Kepler’s second law, or Keplerian motion, after Johannes Kepler, and it was confirmed later by Sir Isaac Newton. Theory indicates that any system where the majority of the mass is at the centre – as with the solar system – will have a rotation curve like this:

Picture
In 1975, Vera Rubin, an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution of Washington and her colleague Kent Ford announced the surprise discovery that most stars in spiral galaxies orbit at roughly the same speed, rather than showing Keplerian motion - these galaxies showed a so-called flat rotation curve.  The implication of this is that galaxy mass is distributed approximately linearly with radius well beyond the location of most of the stars.  The results suggest that at least 50% or more of the galaxies mass is contained in a DM halo around the galaxy extending to a radius of 100kpc or more.  The diagram below shows the rotation curve of our own Galaxy, the Milky Way:
Picture
From this data, at least out to 8.5kpc, where our Sun lies, the rotation curve is flat, rather than Keplerian;  evidence for DM.

Clue 3: Gravitational lensing
Gravitational lensing – the bending of space time due to large masses, which causes light rays to appear to  bend was predicted by Einstein’s General Relativity  in 1917.

Picture
The blue arcs in Figure 4 show the gravitationally lensed image of a galaxy 10 billion light-years away as it appears through the gravitational lens around the galaxy cluster RCS2 032727-132623 about 5 billion light-years away.  However, the amount of lensing is too strong to be accounted for by the mass of normal matter in the foreground galaxy.  The mass required is much larger: further evidence for DM.

So what is  DM? Come back in a couple of weeks for a possible answer......

2 Comments
Fullerton Home Theater link
3/7/2022 02:12:21 pm

Loveed reading this thanks

Reply
Wichita Gay Teens link
6/5/2024 02:57:19 am

Loved reading tthis thanks

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    WMA members

    Archives

    July 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020

    Categories

    All
    Brian Davidson
    Gordon Dennis
    Hugh Allen
    Lilli Helps

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Coming up...
  • The Gallery
    • Aurora 2024 May 10
    • Messier Objects
    • Nebulae
    • Star Clusters
    • Galaxies
    • Solar system
  • ONLINE ASTRO
  • Blog
  • ARCHIVE
  • Shop
  • Committee
  • Contact Us
  • Links